阿森纳官方球迷会OfficialArsenalCN

注册

 

发新话题 回复该主题

帕劳!离开还是退役? [复制链接]

1#

帕劳已经接到俱乐部的通知,俱乐部将不会再为他提供一份新的合同,帕劳现在的合同将会在明年到期。

帕劳在今年夏天有很多转会的传闻,包括米德尔斯堡和WBA。

免责声明:本论坛中该ID的发言并不代表本人的观点,也不代表本人同意其观点。
TOP
2#

不走也不退!

代表阿森纳完成合同再退役!

我不希望看到他代表其他队!

TOP
3#

Ray Parlour has been told by Premiership champions Arsenal that he will not be offered a new deal at the club, with his current contract set to expire next year.

The former England international has been strongly linked with a move this summer, with Middlesbrough and West Bromwich Albion both known to be keen admirers of his abilities.

Parlour, 31, is the longest serving player at Highbury - but he is now considering his future knowing that the coming season would be his last as an Arsenal player.

Boro are thought to be looking at Parlour's situation very closely - but it remains to be seen whether Arsenal would be willing to sell him this summer.

"As it stands he has one year left on his current deal," his agent Steve Kutner told skysports.com.

"He will not be signing another deal as Arsenal have already told us that he will not be offered one.

"If Arsenal are happy with Ray then he will stay, otherwise he will look at his options."

阿森纳的罗伊.帕洛尔被告知俱乐部不将与他签定新合同,这意味着他的合同明年会自动终止.

这位前英格兰国家队队员今夏和多桩转会联系在一起,包括米德尔斯堡和西布罗姆维奇都很赞赏他的能力.

31岁的帕洛尔是在海布里效力时间最长的现役队员,但他现在必须考虑他的未来,因为接下来的的新赛季将是他作为阿森纳队员的最后一年.

罗姆将和帕洛尔走的很近,但还要看阿森纳是否在今夏将他卖掉.

"毕竟他的合同还有一年时间",他的经纪人对天空体育说.

"他不会和其他俱乐部签合同除非阿森纳不与他续签合同."

"如果阿森纳对他满意他将会留下,否则他将为自己的未来打算."

TOP
4#

卖吧...

他现在缺钱...

让他去家能打上比赛的俱乐部吧...

广东GOONERS专用QQ群:11710085

TOP
5#

This would give her the right to share in his continued prosperity as a reward for the support she gave him during his career. Parlour's case may change divorce law in Britain by removing the "glass ceiling" on maintenance settlements. Razor had originally offered £120,000 in annual maintenance. In January, a High Court Family Division judge awarded Mrs Parlour £250,000 a year in maintenance. In addition Parlour, 31, who earns £1.2 million a year, agreed to give his former wife and the mother of his three children, two mortgage-free houses and a £250,000 lump sum. Now what woman would not be happy with that? Mrs Parlour, 33, originally sought £440,000 a year. She is now understood to be willing to accept just over £400,000 for herself. However, this figure does not include maintenance for the couple's children, aged four, six and eight. The issue for the Lord Justices is whether Razors earnings can be split with his former wife. At present, maintenance is awarded on the basis of a spouse's needs rather than the equal share principle that applies to division of matrimonial assets. In his judgment, Mr Justice Bennett, said Mrs Parlour persuaded the midfield player to "grow up" at a time when "laddish culture" was prevalent. Eh? She had also provided support and brought up the couple's children. Ray and Karen Parlour met when the footballer was 17, but did not marry until June 1998. They divorced in August 2002. While living together, Mrs Parlour helped the footballer move away from the heavy drinking that permeated the Arsenal dressing room before Arsene Wenger became manager. She realised that his lifestyle was leading him to "ruin", the court heard. Yesterday Nicholas Mostyn, QC, her counsel, said Mrs Parlour should not lose the chance to share in future wealth. Mr Mostyn asked: "Why should he scoop the pool? If allocation is on the basis of need, then, post-divorce, there is immediate enrichment of the husband and loss on the part of the wife." It had been argued on behalf of Parlour that his ex-wife, a former optician's assistant from Romford, east London, had already shared in his success. But, Mr Mostyn said, the skills, endeavour and hard work that had taken Parlour to the top of his profession were generated during their marriage. The Parlour case is being watched closely by family lawyers, who believe an important precedent will be set if the former wives are successful. An expert in this field of divorce law said: "Unlike in California, the English courts have shied away from giving wives a share of future income. Are we to see greater recognition being given to the contribution which may have been made during a marriage to allowing a party to earn highly in the future?" The case continues.
广东GOONERS专用QQ群:11710085

TOP
6#

总是这样亏本也不是办法啊!能卖多少卖多少啊
TOP
7#

这不是亏本

这代表一种精神,那就是忠诚

所以我希望他留下

TOP
8#

Parlour不能走

看看这段心酸阿    “他不会和其他俱乐部签合同除非阿森纳不与他续签合同”

TOP
9#

以下是引用Gunners007在2004-7-7 19:31:09的发言: This would give her the right to share in his continued prosperity as a reward for the support she gave him during his career. Parlour's case may change divorce law in Britain by removing the "glass ceiling" on maintenance settlements. Razor had originally offered £120,000 in annual maintenance. In January, a High Court Family Division judge awarded Mrs Parlour £250,000 a year in maintenance. In addition Parlour, 31, who earns £1.2 million a year, agreed to give his former wife and the mother of his three children, two mortgage-free houses and a £250,000 lump sum. Now what woman would not be happy with that? Mrs Parlour, 33, originally sought £440,000 a year. She is now understood to be willing to accept just over £400,000 for herself. However, this figure does not include maintenance for the couple's children, aged four, six and eight. The issue for the Lord Justices is whether Razors earnings can be split with his former wife. At present, maintenance is awarded on the basis of a spouse's needs rather than the equal share principle that applies to division of matrimonial assets. In his judgment, Mr Justice Bennett, said Mrs Parlour persuaded the midfield player to "grow up" at a time when "laddish culture" was prevalent. Eh? She had also provided support and brought up the couple's children. Ray and Karen Parlour met when the footballer was 17, but did not marry until June 1998. They divorced in August 2002. While living together, Mrs Parlour helped the footballer move away from the heavy drinking that permeated the Arsenal dressing room before Arsene Wenger became manager. She realised that his lifestyle was leading him to "ruin", the court heard. Yesterday Nicholas Mostyn, QC, her counsel, said Mrs Parlour should not lose the chance to share in future wealth. Mr Mostyn asked: "Why should he scoop the pool? If allocation is on the basis of need, then, post-divorce, there is immediate enrichment of the husband and loss on the part of the wife." It had been argued on behalf of Parlour that his ex-wife, a former optician's assistant from Romford, east London, had already shared in his success. But, Mr Mostyn said, the skills, endeavour and hard work that had taken Parlour to the top of his profession were generated during their marriage. The Parlour case is being watched closely by family lawyers, who believe an important precedent will be set if the former wives are successful. An expert in this field of divorce law said: "Unlike in California, the English courts have shied away from giving wives a share of future income. Are we to see greater recognition being given to the contribution which may have been made during a marriage to allowing a party to earn highly in the future?" The case continues.

razor撒时候离di?

[em16]
TOP
10#

忠诚的老将我们要留下啊!!
TOP
发新话题 回复该主题