阿森纳官方球迷会OfficialArsenalCN

注册

 

发新话题 回复该主题

关于新球场合同的一些补充 [复制链接]

1#

太长了,...慢慢来.

Arsenal may have signed the second biggest sponsorship deal in the history of English football, but Arsene Wenger could have been given even more money to strengthen his stellar squad.

Some industry experts believe Emirates has secured the naming rights to Ashburton Grove and a shirt sponsorship deal on the cheap. The Dubaibased international airline will pay £100million over 15 years to have its logo emblazoned all over the Emirates Stadium and it will also appear on Arsenal's shirt for eight years from the 2006-07 season.

While a return of more than £6m-a-year is more than double the club's £3m-a-year shirt deal with 02, sport sponsorship specialists Sport+Markt AG claim Arsenal could have brought in £5m-a-year for naming rights and £6m-a-year in shirt sponsorship if they had conducted negotiations separately.

Other stories:
Double boost for Arsenal Rooney up for FIFA award Perez backing for Owen Boro to face Lazio Spurs boost as they cut losses How I'll stop Rooney Woodgate close to Madrid debut Jordan hits out at United over agents' fees Fans target Watkins in anti-Glazer fight Fiddy: Fayed overpaid keeper
Unlike on the pitch, where Wenger's side continue to reach new levels of excellence, the Gunners may have undersold themselves.

Sport+Markt's Andrew Walsh said: "Our research has shown that Arsenal, through regular participation in the Champions League, have built up a fan base of more than 11 million in the key five EU countries: UK, France, Germany, Italy and Spain. All these fans will represent a target group for Emirates so to get a deal for both the jersey and naming rights at around £6million-a-year represents a good business deal for the airline."

Emirates's pleasure at linking up with Arsenal more than makes up for the fact it no longer has a deal with Chelsea, who announced last week that their £20m, five-year contract with the airline will not be renewed when it expires next summer-Chelsea have privately claimed Emirates could not afford to maintain links with a club that are now one of the most glamorous in Europe following Roman Abramovich's takeover, but there is little doubt the airline will get more value for money at Highbury.

For a major sponsor to move between rival clubs in the same marketplace is unheard of, but Emirates is aware of the risks involved.

Oliver Butler, of Sport+Markt, said: "It's a very unusual deal as companies rarely work with different clubs in the same market, but should provide good value for Emirates. In the past kit suppliers have changed clubs but not shirt sponsors.

"It's not a risk as it's a long-term deal, but for the first couple of years it will be hard for Emirates to be associated with Arsenal because of the Chelsea link.

"These things happen which is why Emirates is in it for the long haul. It can achieve recognition in the next five years and after that it has a platform to build on."

Butler's research has found that a year after Manchester United announced their new shirt sponsorship deal with Vodafone, 20 per cent of fans thought they were still sponsored by Sharp.

However, Mike Cordwell, who worked on the United deal for Vodafone in 1999, insists the company achieved brand recognition relatively quickly. Vodafone struck a new £9m-a-year deal with United last summer so something must have gone right. Cordwell said: "The association happened reasonably quickly and we were very pleased with the return. United hadn't changed their sponsor for 16 years and fans like to keep up with their team. It was a very easy transfer, possibly helped by the fact both our colours are red and white.

"We felt we were getting a very good return as United are still the superstars of the English game, with even Arsenal lagging behind. There may be some confusion to start with but that will not last long."

Mike Flynn, chief executive of FastWeb Media and the man responsible for Carling's sponsorship of the Premiership, goes even further.

He said: "It's a good deal for everyone-and a win-win situation. Arsenal have secured cash up front and a long-term commitment, while Emirates has got a great association at a good price.

"Emirates was slightly peeved at the noises coming out of Chelsea and has gone to a bigger and better club. It's a positive move for the company. There's always a danger that a brand remains associated with its previous partner, but Emirates should be okay as it has effectively upgraded."

If Chelsea succeed in obtaining the £7m-a-year deal they are seeking, then everyone will be happy.

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-10-6 16:29:48编辑过]

TOP
2#

文章的内容不是讲球会,主要是讲Emirates的经营上的变动的.所以能看懂的就自己看吧.挑了一点来翻译,希望没有曲解意思.

兵工厂虽然签下来英国足球史商第二大的赞助合同,但是我们本该获得更多钱.如果我们把球场冠名权和胸前广告分开出售的话,每年可以分别获得6百万和五百万. 此前,Emirates与海鲜的5年每年2百万的合同到明年到期.海鲜单方面终止了合作. 作为赞助商,在同城死敌之间转换有时候会带来不好的影响.这些影响可能需要5年才能慢慢消化,不过幸好是一个长期的合同,即使头几年受到一些影响,问题也不会太大. Sport+Markt曾经做过一个调查,在鳗鱼宣布vodafone作为赞助商之后一年后,仍有20%的球迷认为他们仍旧由前赞助商Sharp来赞助. Emirate对来自海鲜的不和谐的声音有点不满(主要是指海鲜认为Emirates配不上他们).海鲜希望得到每年7百万的合同.

TOP
3#

我都有点接受不了,习惯Fly  Emirates写在切尔西胸前,需要很多时间适应......

2012.4.30
2012.7.27
Beijing  
世界末日前
最爱的你们,你们,和你
TOP
4#

切尔西还真把自己当回事了

他到哪里找700w的赞助商,除非比尔盖茨开始玩足球了,

TOP
5#

海鲜的教练是农民了还有什么好说的
TOP
6#

以下是引用四季米兰在2004-10-6 20:28:00的发言:

切尔西还真把自己当回事了

他到哪里找700w的赞助商,除非比尔盖茨开始玩足球了,

嘲饿......要是他出手就真的无敌了

TOP
7#

以下是引用睇宋食饭在2004-10-6 16:56:00的发言:

兵工厂虽然签下来英国足球史商第二大的赞助合同,但是我们本该获得更多钱.如果我们把球场冠名权和胸前广告分开出售的话,每年可以分别获得6百万和五百万.

我们为什么不这么做

真可惜

[em13]
TOP
8#

单纯为了钱的话 能得到的更多

TOP
9#
TOP
10#

实在看不出这份合同有什么对我们特别有利的地方.

TOP
发新话题 回复该主题