以下是引用威廉主义在2005-6-25 18:44:03的发言:
1. Robin's lawyer confirmed Robin has changed his initial testimony (already a while ago) & does not deny he had sex with Sandra. This means the DNA evidence is pretty much meaningless now. So Robin cheated on his wife. Though not the most respectable thing to do Adultery is NOT a crime in Holland.
2. Robin's wife is unhappy about what happened but still supports Robin.
3. Tuesday 28 June, a 'police judge' has to decide (if the public prosecution ask for it) if they allow his custody to continue.
4. Robin's lawyer has completed his investigation partaining to Sandra. He will present his evidence to the same police judge.
5. Moszkowicz, Robin lawyer says he has been imprresed by Robin (the way he copes with it): According to his lawyer Robin is a strong powerful young man, not broken, but full of will to fight and pride."Of course he is strengthened by the fact, that he knows he's innocent. That's makes it easier to be strong. But still it's not easy to be in isolation."
Conclusion: there's still no evidence of rape, a statement by the accuser and jsut prove they had sex will not stand up in court (and will not be enough to charge him). The public prosecutor needs to come up with more evidence. The change in Robin's testimony is understandable (he wanted to keep something hidden from is wife) and is no proof whatsoever
如果不出意外的话,周二小范应该就能够出来了。。
当然,前提是证据不足宣判他无罪
[em07]
出来就好,,,,,等出来了再想想办法如何安抚下妻子吧,,
呵呵,就当买个教训,,,,不要乱搞那种不上路的女人,,,,
[em04][em04]